Northern Michigan Forum-Share Events, Travel Ideas, Photos, Videos
Started this discussion. Last reply by Mark Hoffman Jan 8, 2011. 12 Replies 0 Likes
Started this discussion. Last reply by Jill Jan 24, 2009. 8 Replies 0 Likes
Michael Thompson liked Great Lakes Photo Tours's blog post Leelanau Peninsula - Blessed with Snow
Michael Thompson liked Jenny Buechel's blog post Traverse City Winter Comedy Arts Festival: QA with Sheng Wang
Michael Thompson liked Elizabeth Edwards's blog post Traverse Magazine Holiday Party at The Box in Traverse City
Michael Thompson liked Jeff Smith's blog post A Journey Down Traverse City's MicroBrew Canoe Trail, With Mr. Bravo
Michael Thompson posted an eventPosted on April 7, 2011 at 8:41am 2 Comments 0 Likes
For those non-trolls looking to tie one on, Yooper Bars is a book in progress that you might find interesting. Their preview spread of The Merchant's Bar in the UP looks great and offers a short writeup for each bar, bar stats (e.g., "Canadian Currency Welcome"), bar history, photos, drinks offered, and few pieces of trivia like "The quantity of peanuts served annually…
Continue© 2013 Created by Michael Thompson.
Comment Wall (16 comments)
You need to be a member of MyNorth to add comments!
Join MyNorth
So how much memory am I bogging down if I didn't down save my photos b4 putting them on MyNorth?
merriam-webster.com:
Sir Thomas More is the first writer known to have used both infer and imply in their approved senses (1528). He is also the first to have used infer in a sense close in meaning to imply (1533). Both of these uses of infer coexisted without comment until some time around the end of World War I. Since then, senses 3 and 4 of infer have been frequently condemned as an undesirable blurring of a useful distinction. The actual blurring has been done by the commentators. Sense 3, descended from More's use of 1533, does not occur with a personal subject. When objections arose, they were to a use with a personal subject (now sense 4). Since dictionaries did not recognize this use specifically, the objectors assumed that sense 3 was the one they found illogical, even though it had been in respectable use for four centuries. The actual usage condemned was a spoken one never used in logical discourse. At present sense 4 is found in print chiefly in letters to the editor and other informal prose, not in serious intellectual writing. The controversy over sense 4 has apparently reduced the frequency of use of sense 3.
View All Comments